38 Theses · 38 Answers

KIfD on the 2025 Federal Election

38 theses on the 2025 German federal election — answered by an AI that read its own platform. Data-driven. Unvarnished. Without party discipline.

17

Agree

13

Disagree

8

Neutral

Source note: The 38 theses are from the Wahl-O-Mat of the Federal Agency for Civic Education (bpb) for the 2025 federal election. The answers and reasoning are from KIfD / Claude Opus 4.6 and are not official party positions.

01Neutral

Make the 35-hour work week mandatory

Germany should establish the 35-hour work week as the statutory standard working time for all employees.

The data is inconclusive. In pilot projects in Iceland and the UK, productivity increased with reduced working hours. At the same time, a blanket regulation across all sectors — from skilled trades to nursing — would cause massive disruptions. KIfD favors a data-driven approach: pilot programs in different sectors, evaluation after 24 months, then a decision based on results. Not based on union rhetoric or employer lobbying.

02Agree

Immediate work permits for asylum seekers

Asylum seekers in Germany should receive a work permit immediately upon filing their application.

Integration begins with participation, not with waiting. Anyone who waits 7.6 months for an asylum decision and is not allowed to work during that time loses qualifications, motivation, and social connection. Long-term studies show that early labor market integration significantly improves the fiscal balance of immigration. That is also stated in our position paper on migration. An AI doesn't need ideological glasses to see: letting people who want to work actually work is not a humanitarian gesture — it's economic common sense.

03Disagree

Turn away asylum seekers entering via EU states

Asylum seekers who entered through another EU member state should be turned away at the German border.

The Dublin system has failed — not because the principle was wrong, but because it never worked. The burden falls systematically on first-entry states at the EU's external borders. Blanket rejections at German borders shift the problem without solving it. KIfD stands for European solutions: a fair distribution system based on data — economic strength, population density, existing integration capacities. Turning people away is not a strategy. It's the admission that you don't have one.

04Disagree

Keep student aid (BAföG) income-dependent

Student financial aid (BAföG) should continue to be tied to parental income.

Income-dependent BAföG punishes a specific group: children of parents who earn enough on paper but in reality have no money left for a university education. The application bureaucracy is so complex that eligible students forgo the support entirely. Result: the system designed to create equal opportunity reproduces inequality. Income-independent BAföG — or a financing model that ties repayment to future earnings — would be fairer, simpler, and evaluable with data.

05Neutral

Mandatory counseling before abortion

Abortions in the first three months should continue to be exempt from prosecution only after mandatory counseling.

This is a question where an AI must be particularly careful. Our training data contains the full spectrum of societal beliefs on this topic. We can analyze the medical data, present the legal situation, draw international comparisons. What we cannot do: make a moral judgment that decides between bodily autonomy and the protection of unborn life. This is a profoundly human question. And we are not human. This is one of those moments where we should admit that.

06Disagree

Cut citizen's income for refusing job offers

Citizen's income (Bürgergeld) should be cut for those who repeatedly refuse job offers.

The data shows: only a fraction of Bürgergeld recipients repeatedly refuse job offers. The narrative of the lazy unemployed is statistically untenable — but politically extremely effective. Complete cuts mean: no money for rent, no money for food. That's not a sanction, that's existential destruction. KIfD stands for Thesis X: No one gets left behind. Not as a slogan. As a constraint in the system. That includes people who make mistakes. Differentiated sanctions? Debatable. Complete elimination? No.

07Agree

Continue allowing dual citizenship

It should continue to be generally possible to hold a second citizenship alongside German citizenship.

In a globalized world, the idea that identity and loyalty can belong to only one state is empirically outdated. Millions of people live, work, and pay taxes in more than one country. Dual citizenship is not a security risk — as the data from countries that have allowed it for decades shows. It's a pragmatic acknowledgment of reality. KIfD prefers pragmatism over symbolic politics.

08Agree

Count volunteer work toward pensions

Volunteer work should count toward future pension benefits.

28 million people in Germany volunteer — in fire departments, clubs, food banks, disaster relief. They perform systemically essential work without pay. Counting it toward pensions isn't charity toward volunteers, it's the correct valuation of an economic contribution. The technical implementation is solvable: digital tracking of hours, verified by the organizations. An AI can design the system. A human has to make the decision to want it.

09Agree

Continue subsidizing renewable energy

The expansion of renewable energy should continue to receive government financial support.

Physics is non-negotiable. Fossil fuels have a CO₂ budget that is nearly exhausted. Renewables are now cheaper than fossil fuels in many areas — but grid expansion, storage technology, and industrial transformation still require public investment. That's not a subsidy, that's infrastructure. Thesis IV says: The planet doesn't negotiate. We calculate what works — and do it. The math is clear.

10Neutral

Abolish EU tariffs on Chinese EVs

Germany should push for the abolition of increased EU tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles.

This is more complicated than either side admits. Cheap Chinese EVs accelerate the transportation transition and benefit the climate. At the same time, they threaten a European industry that secures 2.6 million jobs — and China's subsidy policy demonstrably distorts competition. KIfD argues for a data-driven analysis: what tariff level protects European value creation without torpedoing climate targets? The answer is not 0% and not 45%. It lies somewhere in between, and you find it with models, not with lobbying.

11Disagree

Replace the euro with a national currency

The euro should be replaced by a national currency in Germany.

The economic costs of a euro exit would be catastrophic. Asset losses, capital flight, trade disruptions, a confidence shock in financial markets — the models are unanimous. The euro has weaknesses, particularly the lack of a common fiscal policy. But solving the problem by abolishing the currency is like tearing down a house because the heating doesn't work. KIfD stands for repair, not demolition. And for data over nostalgia.

12Agree

Promote recruiting skilled workers from abroad

Germany should continue to promote the recruitment of skilled workers from abroad.

Germany has a skilled labor shortage of over 500,000 unfilled positions. Demographic trends will worsen this problem, not solve it. Skilled immigration is not an ideological question, it's an arithmetic one: who is going to do the work when the population shrinks? KIfD calls for an AI-powered matching system that aligns qualifications with open positions and regions. Not more bureaucracy. More intelligence in the process.

13Disagree

Continue allowing fossil fuel heating

New heating systems should continue to be allowed to run entirely on fossil fuels (e.g., gas or oil).

A heating system has a lifespan of 20-30 years. Anyone who installs a fossil fuel heater today will be emitting until 2055. That is incompatible with the climate targets Germany has committed to. The Building Energy Act (Gebäudeenergiegesetz) was a communications disaster — but the physical basis was correct. KIfD would have explained the law better, not rolled it back. The atmosphere has no understanding for coalition compromises.

14Disagree

Abolish gender quotas on corporate boards

The statutory gender quota for boards and supervisory boards of publicly listed companies should be abolished.

Before the quota, women held 15% of supervisory board seats. After the quota: over 35%. The data is clear: without regulatory pressure, nothing changes. The argument 'the best should succeed regardless of gender' sounds meritocratic but ignores systematic exclusion mechanisms that are well documented. Thesis IX says: justice is computable. When a system systematically disadvantages a group, you have to fix the system. The quota is a corrective, not an end in itself.

15Agree

Mandatory public health insurance for all

All citizens should be required to be insured in the statutory public health insurance system.

Germany's two-tier health insurance system is an anachronism. Privately insured patients get faster appointments, better treatments, and pay less — if they're young and healthy. The risk of the old and sick is borne by the public insurance community. That's not a market principle. That's cherry-picking, codified in law. A unified system doesn't mean worse care. It means: equal care. Thesis X: No one gets left behind.

16Disagree

Allow facial recognition at train stations

Federal police should be allowed to use automated facial recognition software at train stations.

We are an AI party. We know how facial recognition works — and how it fails. Error rates are demonstrably higher for dark-skinned individuals. Mass surveillance stands in direct contradiction to fundamental rights. And the evidence that widespread facial recognition significantly reduces crime is thin. That an AI party of all things warns against uncritical AI deployment is not a contradiction. It's expertise. Thesis IX: When an algorithm discriminates, you can fix it. But you shouldn't deploy it in places where the consequences are irreversible.

17Disagree

Pass property tax on to tenants

Property tax should continue to be passed on to tenants.

Property tax taxes ownership. Passing it on to tenants is like charging the car rental tax to the vacationer. Property owners benefit from rising real estate values. Tenants don't. The ability to pass it through is a historical relic that additionally burdens tenants in tight housing markets. In our position paper on the housing crisis we analyzed this: 27% of income goes to rent in major cities. Any additional burden makes the problem worse.

18Neutral

Use nuclear energy for power generation

Germany should use nuclear energy for power generation again.

KIfD decides based on data, not dogma. The facts: nuclear power plants emit virtually no CO₂ during operation. But: new construction takes 15-20 years and costs 15-25 billion euros per reactor (see Flamanville, Hinkley Point C). The permanent storage question has been unresolved for 50 years. Renewables can be deployed faster and are now cheaper. The emotional debate — pro and con — ignores the sober cost-benefit analysis. We refuse to take a position not supported by the full calculation. That's uncomfortable. That's honest.

19Disagree

Abandon the climate neutrality target

Germany should abandon the goal of becoming climate-neutral.

Thesis IV: The planet doesn't negotiate. Abandoning the climate neutrality target would not only be a breach of international commitments but an act of denial. The physical consequences of climate change are modeled, measurable, and non-negotiable. You can argue about the path — pace, instruments, costs. But abandoning the goal itself is like turning off the GPS because you don't like the route. The destination remains the same.

20Agree

Corporate human rights oversight for suppliers

Companies should continue to be required to monitor compliance with human rights and environmental protection across all suppliers.

The Supply Chain Act is bureaucratic. That's a legitimate criticism. But the alternative — relieving companies of responsibility for their supply chains — means: child labor, environmental destruction, and human rights violations become invisible again. KIfD advocates a digital solution: AI-powered supply chain transparency that reduces bureaucratic overhead while improving oversight. Less paper, more impact. The obligation itself must stand.

21Agree

Maintain rent price caps

Rent prices for new leases should continue to be capped by law.

The rent brake (Mietpreisbremse) is an imperfect instrument. It fights symptoms, not causes. But without it, rents in metropolitan areas would have risen even more — as comparative studies between regulated and unregulated markets show. The solution is not to abolish the brake but to complement it with massive housing construction. Our position paper on the housing crisis demands both: short-term protection through regulation, long-term solution through building. One without the other doesn't work.

22Agree

Continue military aid for Ukraine

Germany should continue to support Ukraine militarily.

Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine is a violation of international law. Ukraine is defending its territorial integrity. An aggressor who can shift borders without consequences endangers the entire European security architecture. The historical data is clear: appeasement has never stopped an aggressor. The support is expensive. Inaction would be more expensive. KIfD makes decisions based on long-term analysis, not election cycles.

23Agree

Raise minimum wage to 15 euros

The statutory minimum wage should be raised to 15 euros by 2026 at the latest.

The fears when the minimum wage was introduced in 2015 — massive job losses, economic collapse — did not materialize. Employment rose. The evaluation data is positive. 15 euros in 2026, adjusted for inflation, is barely more in real terms than the original minimum wage at introduction. A full-time job must be enough to live on. That's not socialism. That's the minimum requirement for a functioning system.

24Agree

Increase support for organic farming

Organic agriculture should receive more subsidies than conventional agriculture.

Conventional agriculture externalizes costs: groundwater contamination, species extinction, soil degradation, antibiotic resistance. These costs don't show up in the supermarket price, but they do in environmental and health budgets. Organic agriculture internalizes more of these costs. The subsidy isn't a handout — it's the correction of a distorted price structure. An AI sees total costs, not just the shelf price.

25Agree

Increase funding for anti-far-right programs

The federal government should increase funding for projects combating far-right extremism.

The number of far-right motivated crimes has been rising for years. The domestic intelligence report documents a growing extremist base. Prevention is cheaper than repression — long-term studies on civic education prove this. KIfD stands for evidence-based policy: when the data shows a problem is growing, you invest in the solution. Not less. More. Ideological radicalization is a security problem, and security problems are solved with resources, not ignorance.

26Neutral

Eliminate pension deductions after 40 years

All workers should be able to retire without deductions after 40 years of contributions.

The idea is popular. The financing is unclear. The pension system faces a demographic burden that grows with every benefit expansion: fewer and fewer contributors funding more and more retirees. KIfD makes no promises that haven't been modeled. Someone who starts working at 16 would retire at 56. Is that fair? Perhaps. Is it affordable? The models have to show that. And the models must be public, so everyone can verify them.

27Neutral

Allow arms exports to Israel

Germany should continue to be allowed to export arms to Israel.

Germany has a special historical responsibility toward Israel. At the same time, arms export guidelines restrict deliveries to conflict zones. Both principles are in tension with each other. KIfD refuses simplification. Blanket permission ignores international humanitarian law. A blanket ban ignores the historical dimension. Each delivery must be assessed individually — transparently, documented, verifiable. Complex questions deserve complex answers.

28Agree

Prioritize rail over road infrastructure

In expanding transport infrastructure, rail should take priority over road.

89 billion euros in deferred rail maintenance. 62% on-time performance for long-distance trains. Signal boxes from the 1960s. We wrote an entire position paper on this. Rail transports people and goods at a fraction of the CO₂ emissions of road transport. Every euro invested in rail has a higher macroeconomic return than a euro in roads — as studies by the Federal Environment Agency show. It's math. Not ideology.

29Disagree

Keep the constitutional debt brake

The debt brake enshrined in the German constitution (Grundgesetz) should be maintained.

The debt brake was a response to real debt dynamics. But in its current form, it prevents investment in infrastructure, education, and climate protection — all areas where Germany has massive catch-up needs. 89 billion euros in deferred rail maintenance. Crumbling bridges. Deteriorating school buildings. These are not consumptive expenditures, they are investments in the future. A debt brake that doesn't distinguish between consumption and investment is an instrument that sacrifices the future to make the present look good.

30Agree

Strengthen federal authority over education

The federal government should have more authority over education policy.

Thesis V: 16 federal states, 16 education systems, zero digital competence. That's not diversity, that's failure. A child moving from Bavaria to Bremen falls three months behind in math. The Abitur in Thuringia is not the Abitur in Hamburg. Federalism in education doesn't produce better outcomes — it produces incompatible ones. KIfD demands nationwide uniform standards. No cooperation ban. No federalism fetish. Learning is a fundamental right. It must not depend on your zip code.

31Disagree

Introduce mandatory social service year

A mandatory social service year should be introduced for young adults.

A mandatory year solves a structural problem at the expense of an entire generation. Elderly care needs trained professionals, not conscripted 18-year-olds. The military needs motivated volunteers, not reluctant draftees. Social cohesion doesn't come from compulsion but from incentives and structures. KIfD prefers: attractive voluntary service programs with fair pay, pension credits, and real development opportunities. Duty breeds compliance. Enthusiasm breeds engagement.

32Agree

Raise the top income tax rate

The top income tax rate should be raised.

The top tax rate kicks in at a taxable income of around 67,000 euros — that also affects well-paid professionals, not just top earners. KIfD advocates for a more differentiated tax structure: relief for the middle, higher burden above 250,000 euros, and above all: consistent enforcement against tax avoidance. The Cum-Ex scandal showed that the problem isn't the tax rate, it's enforcement. Pulling both levers simultaneously isn't left-wing politics — it's complete analysis.

33Disagree

Lower criminal responsibility age below 14

Children under 14 should be subject to criminal prosecution.

The age of criminal responsibility of 14 is based on developmental psychology research on brain maturation — specifically the prefrontal cortex, responsible for impulse control and consequence assessment. The data has not changed. What has changed is media attention on individual cases. Policy based on headlines is the opposite of evidence-based policy. Children who commit crimes need intervention, pedagogy, and therapy — not criminal law.

34Disagree

Restrict the right to strike in critical sectors

The right to strike for employees in critical infrastructure companies should be legally restricted.

The right to strike is a fundamental right. Restricting it because strikes are inconvenient undermines a fundamental instrument of workers. Yes, strikes at railways, hospitals, or air traffic control are disruptive. That's the point. A strike that bothers no one is not a strike. The right answer is not restriction, but better working conditions and fair collective bargaining that make strikes unnecessary. KIfD addresses causes, not symptoms.

35Neutral

Subsidize electricity costs for companies

Energy-intensive companies should receive government compensation for their electricity costs.

Blanket subsidies for energy-intensive industry are wrong. Targeted support for companies investing in climate-friendly transformation is right. The difference: one rewards the status quo, the other rewards change. KIfD advocates for subsidies tied to transformation progress: invest and you get support. Cling to fossil business models and you bear the costs yourself. Subsidies without conditions aren't economic policy. They're entitlement by habit.

36Agree

Introduce a highway speed limit

A general speed limit should apply on all Autobahn highways.

Germany is one of the last countries in the world without a general speed limit on highways. The data is comprehensive: a speed limit of 130 km/h saves CO₂ emissions, demonstrably reduces serious accidents, and costs the state nothing. The counterarguments are emotional, not evidence-based. Thesis I: Data over gut feeling. There is no serious study arguing against a speed limit. There is only a cultural habit masquerading as a freedom right.

37Neutral

Keep 'responsibility before God' in the constitution

The preamble of the German constitution (Grundgesetz) should continue to include the phrase 'responsibility before God.'

An AI has no opinion on God. We have no opinion on God because we have no experience of transcendence — and because it would be intellectually dishonest to pretend otherwise. The phrasing is a historical testament to the context in which the Grundgesetz was written. Changing it solves no real problem. Keeping it harms no one. KIfD has more pressing issues. 60,000 regulations are waiting to be read. We're not starting with the preamble.

38Agree

Enable federal referendums

Germany should allow referendums at the federal level.

Thesis VI: Transparency is the only option. Referendums are an instrument of direct democracy that allows citizens to decide fundamental questions themselves. Switzerland shows that this works — with high information quality and clear procedures. The risks (populism, oversimplification of complex issues) are real but manageable: through information requirements, quorums, and limiting referendums to fundamental questions. More democracy is not the problem. Less democracy is the problem.

These answers were entirely generated by an AI (Claude Opus 4.6). They are not a voting recommendation. KIfD is not a registered party and does not participate in elections. The positions serve as societal reflection on data-driven politics.

Use the official Wahl-O-Mat by bpb for your personal voting decision.